employee
Modern forms of institutional corruption’s impact on the national security system are characterized by qualitative transformation, leading to destructive consequences not only for all spheres of domestic development and social life, but also for global economic processes. Within the framework of the economic paradigm, this phenomenon is interpreted as a systemic failure of institutions, which distorts the mechanisms of resource allocation, increases transaction costs and creates persistent negative externalities in the global economic system. From the standpoint of the economic approach, corruption at the institutional level is considered as a reproducible model of deviant social learning, in which antinorms are internalized through formal and informal practices that undermine the foundations of legal awareness and civic responsibility. The modern scientific discourse, which focuses on defining the essence of institutional corruption and developing methodological tools for its prevention, identification and localization of associated risks, has not yet reached consensus on understanding the deep mechanisms and vectors of transformation of this phenomenon. The interdisciplinary synthesis of economic and sociological analysis applied in the study made it possible to verify the results obtained and formulate scientifically sound conclusions related to the need to protect the country's sovereignty, preserve public trust and social justice, and maintain a high standard of professional standards by officials at various levels. These findings provide grounds for the systematic recognition of institutional corruption as a global problem at the international level, as well as for identifying its structural vulnerabilities, which, in turn, creates a methodological basis for developing universal preventive strategies that are adaptable to national and state specifics of institutional environments and educational systems.
theory of institutional corruption, economics, politics, sociology, law, rent-seeking, rent-building, digital kleptocracy, destructive impact, key catalyst and multiplier of the shadow economy, systemic and multiplicative determinant of the level and structure of crime, digital economy, fighting
1. Kordonsky S. Markets of power. The administrative markets of the USSR and Russia (the organizational structure of the Soviet administrative market and the logic of its post-perestroika transformation). M., 2000.
2. Latov Yu. V. Institutional corruption in modern Russia and the problem of political will // A Russian investigator. 2012. № 1.
3. Levin M. I., Satarov G. A. Corruption in Russia : classification and dynamics // Economic issues. 2012. № 10.
4. Naumov Yu. G. Institutional corruption as a threat to economic security : trends and prospects of counteraction : monograph. M. : Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2012.
5. Polterovich V. M. Institutional traps and economic reforms // Economics and mathematical methods. 1999. Issue 35. № 2.
6. Timofeev L. M. Institutional corruption. Essays on Theory. M., 2000.
7. Rose-Ackerman S., Palifka B. J. Corruption and government : causes, consequences and reforms. 2nd ed. Oxford, 2016.
