The issues of increasing the effectiveness of the investigator and inquirer in compensation for damage caused by a crime are considered. It has been established that the institution of voluntary compensation for damage caused by a crime finds its place in criminal proceedings, and, as is known, it can be carried out in several ways: compensation for things of the same kind and quality, instead of lost; correction of damaged things; compensation for damage in monetary terms; compensation for damage that was caused as a result crimes committed by a minor. It is proved that in the case when the object of criminal encroachment is returned in full, the property rights of the victim will be considered restored, and therefore, property damage will not be considered. This implies that the victim will own, use and dispose of the property as before the crime was committed. In conclusion, it is concluded that the explanatory activity of the investigator and the inquirer plays an important role in deciding whether to send a criminal case to court. This activity consists in explaining certain provisions to participants in criminal proceedings.
pre-trial proceedings, head of the investigative body, investigator, harm caused by a crime, voluntary compensation for harm
1. Ivanov D. A. Nalozhenie aresta na imuschestvo, kak mera processual'nogo prinuzhdeniya, primenyaemaya v celyah obespecheniya vozmescheniya imuschestvennogo i moral'nogo vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem // Molodoy uchenyy. 2016. № 25.1. S. 2–4.
2. Kovalenko V. A. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie osobennosti rassmotreniya instituta vozmescheniya vreda putem pred'yavleniya grazhdanskogo iska v ugolovnom processe // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2021. № 12. S. 144–155.
3. Korobkin A. V., Butenko T. P. Ponyatie i pravovaya priroda instituta vozmescheniya vreda, prichinennogo v rezul'tate soversheniya prestupleniya // Voprosy rossiyskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava. 2022. № 3A. S. 174–179.
4. Mihaylov D. O. Sudebnyy shtraf v ugolovnom prave Rossii: diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. M., 2021.
5. Nasonova I. A., Livenceva A. V. Rol' instituta prekrascheniya ugolovnogo dela ili ugolovnogo presledovaniya v svyazi s naznacheniem mery ugolovno-pravovogo haraktera v vide sudebnogo shtrafa // Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii. 2018. № 2. S. 140–145.
6. Obzor praktiki rassmotreniya sudami hodataystv o nalozhenii aresta na imuschestvo po osnovaniyam, predusmotrennym chast'yu 1 stat'i 115 Ugolovno-processual'nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federacii // URL: https://www.vsrf.ru/files/27667/?ysclid=m2aszcx0og448076743
7. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 1 fevralya 2011 g. № 1 (red. ot 28 oktyabrya 2021 g.) «O sudebnoy praktike primeneniya zakonodatel'stva, reglamentiruyuschego osobennosti ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti i nakazaniya nesovershennoletnih» // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
8. Prikaz MVD Rossii ot 31 dekabrya 2013 g. № 1040 «Voprosy ocenki deyatel'nosti territorial'nyh organov MVD Rossii» // SPS «Garant».
9. Smirnova E. V. Pravovoe regulirovanie i voprosy praktiki vozmescheniya vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem, v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve Rossii: diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Volgograd, 2017.
10. Fedorov M. F. Vozmeschenie vreda, prichinennogo prestupleniem // Molodoy uchenyy. 2022. № 18. S. 377–379.
