The study of the normative consolidation, the essence and significance of the general legal and special principles of insolvency (bankruptcy) of legal entities for the development of theoretical and practical results of optimization of this institution. The judgment is substantiated that in the system of interrelated principles of insolvency (bankruptcy) of legal entities it is necessary to identify special principles, including the independent principles of responsibility of a legal entity, the inadmissibility of opposition by holding structures to the implementation of insolvency (bankruptcy) procedures, etc. This scientific approach makes it possible to understand the essence, specifics, prospects and ways to optimize the studied insolvency (bankruptcy) procedures to the greatest extent. The situations where a peculiar «combination» of general legal and special principles takes place are characterized; so, for example, regarding the expediency of participation (or non-participation) in the implementation of bankruptcy prevention or clarification of the obligations of the relevant bank, the Deposit Insurance Agency is accepted in accordance with the principles of minimum use of the deposit insurance fund (in part of its funds) or other property of this structure, the necessary awareness of the financial situation of the relevant bank, (special principles), as well as principles of reasonableness and good faith (general legal principles).
insolvency, bankruptcy, principle, integrity, reasonableness, equality, system
1. Gabov A. V. Ekonomicheskaya zavisimost' yuridicheskih lic: otdel'nye razmyshleniya o razvitii instituta // Grazhdanskoe pravo. 2022. № 3. S. 11–21.
2. Gutnikov O. V. Tendencii razvitiya korporativnogo prava v sovremennyh usloviyah // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2020. № 8. S. 59–73.
3. Kokorin I. V. Vse kreditory ravny, no nekotorye rovnee drugih. K voprosu o subordinacii korporativnyh zaymov pri bankrotstve v Rossii, Germanii i SShA // Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2018. № 2. S. 119–137.
4. Lomakin D. V. Princip samostoyatel'noy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskogo lica: pravilo i isklyucheniya // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2020. № 1. S. 93–110.
5. Obzor sudebnoy praktiki Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii № 4 (2018) (utv. Prezidiumom Verhovnogo Suda RF 26 dekabrya 2018 g.) // Byulleten' Verhovnogo Suda RF. 2019. № 8. S. 23.
6. Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ekonomicheskim sporam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 25 sentyabrya 2015 g. № 307-ES15-6545 po delu № A13-1513/2014 // Byulleten' Verhovnogo Suda RF. 2015. № 10. S. 51.
7. Opredelenie Sudebnoy kollegii po ekonomicheskim sporam Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 6 oktyabrya 2016 g. № 305-ES16-7657 po delu № A40-125377/2015 // Byulleten' Verhovnogo Suda RF. 2016. № 11. S. 25.
8. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 21 dekabr' 2017 g. № 53 «O nekotoryh voprosah, svyazannyh s privlecheniem kontroliruyuschih dolzhnika lic k otvetstvennosti pri bankrotstve» // Byulleten' Verhovnogo Suda RF. 2018. № 3. S. 34–36.
9. Subachev A. K. Sub'ekty kriminal'nogo bankrotstva: ocenka zakonodatel'nyh novell i prognoz ih pravoprimeneniya // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2023. № 1. S. 99–114.
10. Federal'nyy zakon ot 26 oktyabrya 2002 g. № 127-FZ (red. ot 4 oktyabrya 2023 g.) «O nesostoyatel'nosti (bankrotstve)» // Parlamentskaya gazeta. 2002. 2 noyab.
