The authors of this article, taking into account criminological, criminological and criminal law aspects, classified the circumstances that contributed to the commission of the crime. The authors propose to classify the above circumstances, taking into account the following factors: the identity of the suspect (accused); living conditions and upbringing of the person who committed the crime; the social circle of the person who committed the crime; circumstances of origin of criminal intent; circumstances of an objective nature, the totality of which makes it possible to commit a specific crime; lack of preventive principles and preventive work in the presence of appropriate conditions. It has been established that the factors considered by the authors, by which the classification of the circumstances under study were carried out, are conditional and are not exhaustive in nature. At the same time, the classification of the circumstances under consideration allows the head of the investigative body and the investigator to correctly and competently plan their daily activities aimed at identifying, proving and eliminating them. It has been proven that the classification of circumstances that contributed to the commission of a crime is necessary to build an algorithm of actions to identify, prove and eliminate them at all stages of pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases. Only when all three dominants are achieved (detection, proof, elimination) will the goals of criminal proceedings be achieved.
head of the investigative body, investigator, pre-trial proceedings in criminal cases, circumstances that contributed to the commission of the crime, reasons and conditions for the commission of the crime
1. Algazin A. I. Metodika rassledovaniya prestupleniy, sovershaemyh s cel'yu polucheniya strahovoy vyplaty: dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. Omsk, 2000. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NLVVTT
2. Ahmedshin R. L. Kriminalisticheskaya harakteristika lichnosti prestupnika: dis.. dokt. yurid. nauk. Tomsk, 2006. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NOKTTJ
3. Kozlov S. S. Nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy k Federal'nomu zakonu ot 24 iyunya 1999 goda № 120-FZ "Ob osnovah sistemy profilaktiki beznadzornosti i pravonarusheniy nesovershennoletnih" // [Elektronnyy resurs] SPS "Konsul'tantPlyus" (data obrascheniya: 18.08.2024).
4. Kriminologiya: uchebnoe posobie dlya studentov vuzov / A. V. Bokov, S. A. Solodovnikov, E. A. Antonyan i dr.; pod red. prof. S. M. Inshakova. M.: YuNITI-DA-NA; Zakon i pravo, 2005. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QWIMNN
5. Kudryavcev V. N. K voprosu ob izuchenii prichin prestupnosti // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. 1964. № 5.
6. Min'kovskiy G. M., Arzumanyan T. M., Zvirbul' V. K. i dr. Deyatel'nost' organov rassledovaniya, prokurora i suda po preduprezhdeniyu prestupleniy. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1962.
7. Selivanov N. A. Profilakticheskaya rabota sledovatelya // Spravochnik sledovatelya. Vypusk vtoroy (Prakticheskaya kriminalistika: rassledovanie otdel'nyh vidov prestupleniy). M.: Yurid. lit., 1990.
8. Shlyapochnikov A. S. O klassifikacii obstoyatel'stv, sposobstvuyuschih soversheniyu prestupleniya // Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo. M., 1964. № 10.
9. Eminov V. E., Antonyan Yu. M. Ugolovnoe pravo i kriminologiya // Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava. 2015. № 1 (50).
