The article, based on the analysis of theoretical and regulatory sources, identifies problematic aspects of bringing legal entities to public-law liability. The author's position on expanding the scope of such liability through the establishment of a legislative opportunity to bring legal entities to criminal liability is substantiated.
public-law liability, administrative liability, criminal liability, state coercion
1. Abramov V. Yu., Abramov Yu. V. Pravovoe regulirovanie novyh vidov predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti: prakticheskoe posobie. M.: Yusticinform, 2023. 320 s.
2. Ioffe O. S. Iz istorii civilisticheskoy mysli (Civilisticheskaya doktrina promyshlennogo kapitalizma) // Ioffe O. S. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu. M., 2000. S. 106-107.
3. Kachalov V. V. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskih lic: kriticheskiy analiz argumentov protiv // Lex russica (Russkiy zakon). 2016. № 12 (121). S. 32-40. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XXRHQN
4. Kashepov V. P. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost' yuridicheskih lic za korrupcionnye prestupleniya // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2015. № 3. S. 90-101. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TNVMRR
5. Kisin V. R. Osobennosti administrativnoy otvetstvennosti yuridicheskih lic: material'no-pravovoy i processual'nyy aspekty // Administrativnoe pravo i process. 2023. № 8. S. 45-49. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LVLOCI
