UDC 343
this scientific paper is devoted to the study of legal qualification issues related to household self-will (unauthorized actions) in the Russian Federation. The subject of analysis is domestic self-will as a form of unlawful behavior arising from conflicts between neighbors over the exercise of housing and related rights. The purpose of this research is to analyze law enforcement practices concerning self-will cases, to identify the criteria distinguishing administrative and criminal liability, and to assess the legal consequences of such actions in the housing sphere. To achieve this goal, the following tasks were set: to analyze current legislation regulating self-will (Article 19.1 of the Administrative Offences Code of the Russian Federation and Article 330 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation), to examine judicial practice, to review examples of housing conflicts containing elements of self-will, to identify gaps in legal regulation, to define the criteria for determining "significant harm," and to propose recommendations for improving legislation. The study employs scientific methods such as the formal legal method, comparative legal analysis, logical legal reasoning, and the method of analyzing specific law enforcement situations. The findings of the research indicate that household self-will typically has a complex nature and is closely linked with other violations in related areas. The key criterion for distinguishing liability lies in the degree of public danger and the nature of the harm caused. The study emphasizes the need for clearer legislative differentiation of concepts and the improvement of preventive mechanisms aimed at deterring such acts.
self-will, criminal and administrative self-will, household conflicts, significant harm in cases of self-will
1. Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah ot 30 dekabrya 2001 g. № 195-FZ (v red. ot 7 aprelya 2025 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2002. № 1. Ch. 1. St. 1.
2. Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 13 iyunya 1996 g. № 63-FZ (v red. ot 21 aprelya 2025 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii. № 25. St. 2954.
3. URL: https://www.consultant.ru
4. Artyushkina S. V. Samoupravstvo: teoreticheskie i pravoprimenitel'nye aspekty: avtoref. diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Saratov, 2012.
5. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 30 noyabrya 2017 g. № 48 «O sudebnoy praktike po delam o moshennichestve, prisvoenii i rastrate» // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
6. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii (chast' pervaya) ot 30 noyabrya 1994 goda № 51-FZ (s izm. ot 31 oktyabrya 2024 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii. 1994. № 32. St. 3301.
7. Zhilischnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 29 dekabrya 2004 g. № 188-FZ (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 1 marta 2025 g.) // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
8. Postanovlenie Pervogo kassacionnogo suda obschey yurisdikcii ot 29 noyabrya 2022 g. № 77-6112/2022. Prigovor: po ch. 1 st. 330 UK RF (samoupravstvo). Postanovlenie: prigovor otmenen, ugolovnoe delo prekrascheno za otsutstviem sostava prestupleniya // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
9. Postanovlenie Pervogo kassacionnogo suda obschey yurisdikcii ot 7 noyabrya 2023 g. № 77-5212/2023 «O prekraschenii ugolovnogo dela, v svyazi s otsutstviem sobytiya prestupleniya ili otsutstviem v deyanii sostava prestupleniya» // SPS «Konsul'tantPlyus».
10. Doych M. Teoriya kooperacii i konkurencii. M. : Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2004. S. 23–45.
11. Granovetter M. The Strength of Weak Ties // American Journal of Sociology. 1973. Vol. 78. No. 6. P. 1360–1380.
12. URL: http://api-press.rf.
