employee
One of the doctrinal discussions is considered - about the possibility of the existence of obligations with non-property content. Such an opportunity was noted by pre-revolutionary scientists, they talked about it in Soviet times. Currently, in the domestic doctrine, the dominant (most common) position is still about the exclusively property nature of obligations. Proponents of the existence of non-property obligations point to traditional organizational contracts as contractual examples, including a preliminary contract, a corporate contract, a master contract, etc. As examples, agreements are also called to refute information discrediting honor, dignity and business reputation and others. Criticizing this approach, scientists mainly refer to the impossibility of applying sanctions to non-property obligations. One of the common ideas that determines the strictly property nature of any obligation is also the idea that through the obligation there is a turnover (exchange of goods). Conclusions are formulated based on assumptions about the existence of an obligation with non-property content.
content of the obligation, property and non-property obligation, attribute of obligation, intangible benefit, interest, needs of the subject, sanctions, accessory obligation, penalty
1. Grimm D. D. Lectures on the dogma of Roman law: textbook. M. : Zertsalo, 2015.
2. Shershenevich G. F. Textbook of Russian civil law. M. : SPARK, 1995.
3. Agarkov M. M. Selected works on civil law. In 2 vol. Vol. I. M. : Center «Yurinfor», 2002.
4. Ioffe O. S. Selected works. In 4 vols. Vol. III. The law of obligations. St. Petersburg : Legal Center «Press», 2004.
5. Sukhanov E. A. Civil law. Vol. 3. M. : Volters Kluwer, 2005.
6. Civil law. Part I. 2nd ed., reprint. and add. / edited by A. P. Sergeev, Yu. K. Tolstoy. M. : Prospekt, 1997.
7. Passek E. V. Non-property interest in commitment. Yuriev, 1893.
8. Vinaver M. M. From the field of civil studies. St. Petersburg, 1908.
9. Gambarov Yu. S. Course of civil law. Part general. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg, 1911.
10. Pokrovsky I. A. The main problems of civil law. M. : Statute, 1998.
11. Novitsky I. B. The general doctrine of obligation. M. : State Publishing House of Legal Literature, 1950.
12. Fogelson Yu. B. Selected issues of the general theory of obligations. M. : Jurist, 2001.
13. Egorov N. D. On the issue of the concept of obligation // Collection of articles dedicated to the 55th anniversary of E. A. Krasheninnikov. Yaroslavl, 2006. P. 47–48.
14. Sinaisky V. I. Russian civil law. 2nd ed. Issue II. Kiev, 1918.
15. Ryasentsev V. A. Non-property interest in Soviet civil law // Scientific notes of the MUI. 1939. Issue 1. P. 37–41.
16. Dombrovsky E. Non-property interest in civil law // Socialist legality. 1937. No. 8. P. 94–101.
17. Braginsky M. I. General doctrine of economic contracts. Mn., 1967.
18. Morozov S. Y. System of transport organizational contracts. M. : Norm, 2011.
19. Krassov E. O. Contracts in the field of organization of electric energy supply in the Russian Federation: monograph. 2nd ed., revised. M. : Norm, 2025.20.
20. Passek E. V. Non-property interest and irresistible force in civil law. M. : Statute, 2003.
21. Trepitsyn I. N. The civil law of the Provinces of the Kingdom of Poland and Russian in connection with the draft civil Code. The general part of the law of obligations. Warsaw, 1914.
22. Popondopulo V. F. Law of obligations: general characteristics and problems // Leningrad Law Journal. 2009. No. 1. P. 7–38.
23. Gavze F. I. Law of obligations (general provisions). Mn., 1968.
24. Kurbatov A. Ya. Business law: problems of theory and law enforcement: monograph. M. : Justicinform, 2022.
25. Bogatyrev F. O. On the question of the existence of obligations with an intangible interest // Journal of Russian Law. 2004. No. 1.
26. Bogatyrev F. O. Composition of relative non-property civil relations // Journal of Russian Law. 2002. No. 11. P. 84–94.
27. Reforming civil legislation: general provisions on transactions, obligations and contracts: monographs / I. Z. Ayusheeva, I. S. Bogdanova, E. S. Boltanova et al.; edited by V. V. Dolinskaya. M. : Prospekt, 2018.
28. Rozhkova M. A. Protection of business reputation in cases of defamation or misuse (in the field of commercial relations): scientific and practical the manual. M. : Statute, 2015.
29. Erdelevsky A. On the legal nature of business reputation // LRS «ConsultantPlus».
30. Tyutryumov I. M. Civil code. The project with explanations. Vol. 2. St. Petersburg, 1910.
31. Godeme E. General theory of obligations. M., 1948.
32. Chilarzh K. F. Textbook of institutions of Roman law. 2nd ed. M. : Printing house of A. I. Snegireva, 1906.
33. Dernburg G. Pandekty. Vol. 2. Law of obligations. M., 1911.
34. Cosack K. Lehrbuch des birgerlichen rechts. Bd. 1. Das allgemeinen lehren und das schuldrecht. 7 aufl. Jena, 1922.
35. Windscheid B. On obligations under Roman law. St. Petersburg, 1875.
36. Tolstoy V. S. The concept of obligation under Soviet civil law // Scientific notes of VYUZI. 1971. P. 117–118.
37. Ryasentsev V. A. Soviet civil law. Vol. 1. M., 1975.
38. Mezrin B. N. Modeling of civil non-property obligations // Problems of law of obligations: interuniversity collection of scientific tr. Sverdlovsk, 1989. P. 15–27.
