The prevailing legal paradigm of understanding rights and freedoms at the international level, and in democratic States at the national level, has conditioned people's natural claims to the right to security. In this context, the right to security is comprehensive, increasingly acquiring the properties of natural law. The recognition and institutionalization of the right to security is conditioned by the fundamental nature of the phenomenon of «security», which has recently acquired the status of the most important constitutional value. In the constitutional and legal sense, the right to security is positioned with the integrity of the health, honor, freedom and property of citizens, the inviolability and stability of the constitutional order and the basic foundations of society and the state. Being a condition for guaranteeing and realizing the right to safety, the space of a safe environment covers all spheres of life without exception; in this part, people's expectations have no boundaries. From this point of view, highly effective activities of the state and institutions of society aimed at preventing any danger, ranging from terrorist threats, man-made disasters and up to accident prevention, are a condition for guaranteeing and realizing the right to safety. Accordingly, the limits of this right are not defined by any one sphere of human activity; they cover the entire space of his being, including information, environmental, food, economic, housing, transport security and other areas. In this understanding of the concept of the «right to security», the State's security activities include a set of continuous and targeted measures to predict, minimize, eliminate, and prevent hazards and threats through the implementation of risk management mechanisms, as well as the creation of protective mechanisms to counter harm to the vital interests of individuals, society, and the State. In this way, risk zones and possible threats are narrowed both in relation to an individual and communities of people. It is clear that in such conditions a person feels protected, out of danger, does not feel fear of the external environment; the latter acts as a positive background for the implementation of his life plans.
natural claims to security, security as a priority basis for restricting rights and freedoms, the right to a safe living environment, the right to digital security, the right to protection, the right to information security, simulacra of the right to security
1. Chervonyuk V. I. Constitutional law of Russia: textbook: general part. Book 2. M. : Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after V.Ya. Kikot’, 2019.
2. Chervonyuk V. I. Structure of law: theory, methodology, technologies and practices of formation: monograph. M. : Justicinform, 2024.
3. Kovler A. I. Anthropology of human rights in the digital age (experience of comparative analysis) // Journal of Russian Law. 2022. No. 12. P. 5–29.
4. Volkova N. S., Efremov A. A., Zyryanov S. M. and others. The state, society and personality: ways to overcome challenges and threats in the information sphere: monograph. M. : Infotropik Media, 2024.
5. Gorlinsky V. V. Existential security as a paradigm for the preservation of human existence // Philosophical thought. 2015. No. 2. P. 1–4.
6. Chervonyuk V. I. The relationship between freedom and security: new challenges and the problem of choosing priorities (constitutional and legal context) // In the collection: The development of Russian law: new contexts and the search for solutions to the problem: proceedings of the X International Scientific and practical conference (Kutafinsky readings). M. : Moscow State Law University named after O.E. Kutafin (MSLA), 2016. P. 212–217.
7. Napso M. B. Risks and challenges of trafficking in false information: on the issue of ensuring the security, rights and freedoms of the individual // Modern Law. 2024. No. 4. P. 55–62.
8. Gontar L. O. On the protection of personal data as an institute of international information cybersecurity on the example of the projection of individual international organizations // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence. 2020. No. 1. P. 74–86.
9. Federal Law No. 492-FZ of December 30, 2020 «On Biological Safety in the Russian Federation» // Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2021. No. 1. P. I. Art. 31.
10. Federal Law No. 7-FZ of January 10, 2002 «On Environmental Protection» // Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2002. No. 2. Art. 133.
11. Aleshkova I. A. The relationship between the right to biological safety and the right to reliable information about the state of the environment as a factor in building trust in society // Constitutional and municipal law. 2023. No. 11. P. 37–41.
12. Constitutions of European states. In 3 vol. Vol. 2. M. : Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, 2001.
13. Constitutions of European States. In 3 vol. Vol. 1. M. : Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, 2001.
14. Constitutions of the states of Africa and Oceania: collection. Vol. 5. Oceania. M. : Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, 2022.
15. Constitutions of the States of America. In 3 vol. Vol. 2. Caribbean. M. : Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation, 2006.
16. Chervonyuk V. I. The idea of law and law in ideas. In 2 vol. Vol. II. Book 1. Theory of Constitutional law: comparative legal and regional studies analysis: monograph. M. : Justicinform, 2022.
