In the article the system analysis of legislation and generally accepted judicial practice is carried out in order to establish the peculiarities of civil liability of the seller for unilateral refusal to fulfill the contract of sale concluded by remote method. As a result of the research it is proved that the seller has no right to unilaterally refuse to fulfill the obligation to deliver the goods pre-paid by the consumer both in case of absence of the ordered goods in stock, and in case of incorrect indication of information about its cost. The analysis of court practice shows that the return by the seller of money paid by the buyer without legal grounds does not entail legal consequences. In this case, compensation for losses and payment of penalties does not release the seller from the obligation to deliver the goods.
retail sale contract, distance selling of goods, delivery of goods, unilateral refusal of the seller to fulfill the obligation, civil liability of the seller, protection of consumer rights
1. Dolya prodazh cherez Internet v obschem ob'eme oborota roznichnoy torgovli / Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki // URL://https://rosstat.gov.ru/statistics/roznichnayatorgovlya (data obrascheniya: 28.03.2024).
2. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii (chast' pervaya) ot 30 noyabrya 1994 g. № 51-FZ (red. ot 11.03.2024) // Oficial'nyy internet-portal pravovoy informacii // URL://https://www.pravo.gov.ru (data obrascheniya: 28.03.2024).
3. Zakon Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 07 fevralya 1992 g. № 2300-1 (red. ot 04.08.2023) "O zaschite prav potrebiteley" // Oficial'nyy internet-portal pravovoy informacii // URL://https://www.pravo.gov.ru (data obrascheniya: 28.03.2024).
4. Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 31 dekabrya 2020 g. № 2463 "Ob utverzhdenii Pravil prodazhi tovarov po dogovoru roznichnoy kupli-prodazhi, perechnya tovarov dlitel'nogo pol'zovaniya, na kotorye ne rasprostranyaetsya trebovanie potrebitelya o bezvozmezdnom predostavlenii emu tovara, obladayuschego etimi zhe osnovnymi potrebitel'skimi svoystvami, na period remonta ili zameny takogo tovara, i perechnya neprodovol'stvennyh tovarov nadlezhaschego kachestva, ne podlezhaschih obmenu, a takzhe o vnesenii izmeneniy v nekotorye akty Pravitel'stva Rossiyskoy Federacii" // Oficial'nyy internet-portal pravovoy informacii // URL://https://www.pravo.gov.ru (data obrascheniya: 28.03.2024).
5. Opredelenie Chetvertogo kassacionnogo suda obschey yurisdikcii ot 23 sentyabrya 2021 g. po delu № 88-23399/2021 // URL://https://4kas.sudrf.ru (data obrascheniya: 28.03.2024).
6. Opredelenie Verhovnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federacii ot 06 iyunya 2023 g. po delu №16-KG23-6-K4 // URL://https://vsrf.ru/lk/practice/stor_pdf/2258070 (data obrascheniya: 28.03.2024).
7. Reshenie Vologodskogo gorodskogo suda ot 12 sentyabrya 2019 g. po delu № 2-8878/2019 // URL://https://vologodskygor-vld.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=doc&number=79669740&delo_id=1540005&new=0&text_number=1 (data obrascheniya: 28.03.2024).
8. Apellyacionnoe opredelenie Volgogradskogo oblastnogo suda ot 21 dekabrya 2023 g. po delu № 33-13927/2023 // URL://https://oblsud-vol.sudrf.ru/modules.php?name=sud_delo&srv_num=1&name_op=doc&number=35521699&delo_id=5&new=5&text_number=1 (data obrascheniya: 28.03.2024).
