employee
The concept of technological sovereignty as a key element of Russia's national security is considered. The classical approach to this topic is often based on static perception, and the introduction of a more dynamic model makes it possible to identify the paradox of technological sovereignty, where a critical mass of technological autonomy triggers a mechanism of self-reinforcement and transforms a defensive strategy into an offensive one. The proposed model of the technological security cycle contains phases that allow identifying threats, mobilizing resources, implementing technological developments, consolidating results, and generating new breakthroughs in Russia's national security system.
technological sovereignty, national security, and a dynamic model
1. Papageorgiou M., Can M., Vieira A. China as a threat and balancing behavior in the realm of emerging technologies // Chinese Political Science Review. 2024. 9. No. 4. Vol. P. 441–482.
2. Kyung H., Lee J. Changes in Semiconductor Geopolitics and the Way Forward for Korea // Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade Research Paper. 2022. Vol. 22. P. 07–02.
3. Freilich C. D., Cohen M. S., Siboni G. Israel and the cyber threat: How the startup nation became a global cyber power. Oxford University Press. P. 440



