employee
employee
Russian Federation
The article is devoted to the development of a comprehensive methodology for studying the category of prohibition in administrative and tort law. The article analyzes the dual (material and procedural) nature of administrative prohibition, its regulatory and protective functions, and its essential characteristics. The authors criticize the limitations of the traditional dogmatic approach and substantiates the need for an interdisciplinary methodological framework that integrates structural-dogmatic, functional-economic, socio-legal, and value-constitutional levels of analysis. The proposed model is illustrated using a case study of illegal entrepreneurship. The research results in a holistic methodological construct that allows for a comprehensive examination of the effectiveness, legitimacy, and constitutionality of administrative prohibitions.
administrative offense, the legal nature of the prohibition, methodology of legal research, the principle of proportionality, assessment of regulatory impact, comparative jurisprudence, the composition of the offense
1. Bakhakh D. N. Administrative law of Russia. Moscow : Eksmo, 2018. 608 p.
2. Konin N. M. Administrative law of Russia : general part. Moscow : Prospekt, 2020. 456 p.
3. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Administrative law and process. Moscow : Edition Tikhomirov M.Yu., 2021. 784 p.
4. Baldwin R., Cave M. Understanding Regulation. Oxford University Press, 2012. 552 p.
5. Alyokhin A. P., Karmolitsky A. A. Administrative law of Russia. Moscow : Zertsalo-M, 2019. 752 p.
6. Sorokin V. D. Administrative procedural law. St. Petersburg : Law Center Press, 2008. 560 p.
7. Zubach A. V. The principle of proportionality of limitation of rights in administrative law // Administrative law and process. 2020. No. 8. pp. 12-18.
8. Sunstein C. R. Why Nudge? Yale University Press, 2014. 208 p.
9. Stakhov A. I. Administrative responsibility. Moscow : UNITY-DANA, 2017. 463 p.
10. Galligan D. J. Discretionary Powers. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990. 426 p.
11. Kenik K. V. Administrative responsibility of legal entities in the law of Germany and Russia. Moscow : Infotropik Media, 2016. 288 p.
12. Magyarova A. V. Assessment of regulatory impact as a tool of anti-corruption expertise // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence. 2018. № 5. P. 105–112.
13. Volkov V. V. Sociology of Law. St. Petersburg : Law Center, 2015. 432 p.
14. Resolution of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation № 4-P dated February 14, 2013 // Collection of Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2013. № 8. Art. 874.
15. Judgment of the ECHR in the case «VgT Verein gegen Tierfabriken v. Switzerland», 2009.
16. Review of judicial practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in cases of administrative offenses in the sphere of entrepreneurial activity, 2014.
17. Radaev V. V. Shadow economy in Russia // Economic sociology. 2016. Vol. 17. № 5. P. 134–158.
18. Yanitskiy O. N. Sociology of risk // The world of Russia. 2017. Vol. 26. № 1. P. 88–115.
19. Avakian S. A. Constitutional law of Russia. Vol. 1. Moscow : Norm, 2020. 864 p.
20. Baranov P. P., Salnikov V. P. Actual problems of administrative justice // State and law. 2019. № 11. P. 70–80.
